As wealth and
income become more unequal, and as opportunities to move up economically
dwindle, the U.S. is starting to look ever more like Panem, the dystopia of
Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games books
and the films being made from them. A handful of people in the Capital live
lavishly, eat heartily and give themselves drugs to throw up so they can keep
eating, while working-class people struggle harder every year to pay an
ever-higher cost of living on wages that are staying still or going down.
Some Americans,
including members of the 1 percent themselves, think this is just fine. Kevin
O’Leary, host of the hit TV show Shark Tank,
responded to a recent report by the British charity Oxfam that the world’s
richest 85 families have as much wealth as the lower 50 percent of the entire
global population by saying, “It’s fantastic. And
this is a great thing because it inspires everybody. They get the motivation to
look up to the one percent and say, ‘I want to become one of those people. I am
going to fight hard to get up to the top.’ This is fantastic news and of course
I applaud it. What can be wrong with this?”
Others, like libertarian economist Tyler Cowen, say that
growing inequality is inevitable and we’re just going to have to live with it.
In his book The Great Stagnation, Cowen
said America’s economic future is going to be a three-class division between a
super-rich 1 percent, an increasingly impoverished 90 percent and a so-called
“infoclass” of 9 percent of the population working jobs requiring heavy
intellectual training and talent. Cowen argues that the only chance most
Americans will have for upward mobility is to work their asses off to get out
of the 90 percent and into that 9 percent “infoclass.”
Still other Americans believe that the growing inequality
of wealth and income were caused by deliberate policies pursued by politicians
increasingly in thrall to wealthy individual and corporate contributors. What
has been done, they believe, can be undone — if the people who are suffering
from increasing inequality come together and get active. Activist San Diego is
presenting a program with four local activists with long histories battling
inequality and working to enable all Americans to have basic economic security,
including access to adequate food, shelter and health care. The event will take
place Monday, April 21, 7 p.m. at the Joyce Beers Community Center, 3900
Vermont Street, just north of University Avenue in Hillcrest. The speakers are:
• FLOYD MORROW, former San Diego City Councilmember.
• SANDY NARANJO, staff member, United Food and Commercial
Workers Local 135.
• TONY PÉREZ, Fight for 15 Campaign and Coalition for Labor
and Community Solidarity.
• ROBERT NOTHOFF, Center on Policy Initiatives.
• ROBERT NOTHOFF, Center on Policy Initiatives.
A representative of the Center on Policy Initiatives, a
progressive think tank in San Diego, has also been invited.
The panelists will be discussing the following issues:
• Why is income
inequality increasing in the U.S. and San Diego?
• Is this good or
bad?
• What are the
potential ramifications for economic growth and the existence of a middle
class?
• What, if
anything, can or should be done to reverse the growth of income inequality?
Also, Activist
San Diego will be sponsoring a screening of the 2013 documentary Inequality for All,
featuring former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert Reich. The screening will take
place Saturday, April 26, 7 p.m. at the same location as the panel: the Joyce Beers Community Center, 3900 Vermont Street, just
north of University Avenue in Hillcrest. In an unusual move, Reich and his
producers have encouraged people to put on informal screenings of his film to
build awareness of what can be done to fight back against increasing economic
inequality.
“There is this
popular misconception that the economy is kind of out there, it’s kind of
natural forces that can’t be changed. They’re immutable. We all sort of work
for this economy,” Reich told TV host Bill Moyers last September in an
interview to promote his film. “But in reality, the economy is a set of rules.
There’s no economy in the state of nature. There are rules about property and
liability and anti-trust and bankruptcy and subsidies for certain things and
taxes for certain things. … They determine economic outcomes. If we don’t like
them, we can change the rules. If we had a democracy that was working as a
democracy should be working, we could adapt the rules so that, for example, the
gains of economic growth were more widely distributed without a sacrifice of
efficiency or innovation.”